Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 26 “a pro se petitioner’s lack of legal sophistication is not, by itself, an extraordinary 27 circumstance warranting equitable tolling”
• holding that “a pro se petitioner’s lack of legal sophistication is not, by itself, an extraordinary circumstance warranting equitable tolling”
• holding that “lack of legal sophistication” does not warrant equitable tolling
• collecting cases from other circuits and holding that “a pro se petitioner’s lack of legal sophistication is not, by itself, an extraordinary circumstance warranting equitable tolling.”
• joining other circuits in holding that a pro se 25 petitioner’s claim of ignorance of the law does not constitute an extraordinary 26 circumstance warranting equitable tolling
• Rhines stay and abeyance rule does not apply to a petition alleging only unexhausted claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).