Rose v. Lundy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]s a matter of comity, federal courts should not consider a claim in a habeas corpus petition until after the state courts have had an opportunity to act.”
• “In 20 sum, because a total exhaustion rule promotes comity and does not 21 unreasonably impair the prisoner’s right to relief, we hold that a district court 22 must dismiss habeas petitions containing both unexhausted and exhausted 23 claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).