Skip to main content

Ogden v. Ogden

Citations

  • 39 P.3d 513
  • 2001 Alas. LEXIS 175
  • 2001 WL 1598179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the valuation step of division of marital assets involves factual determinations reversed only where the trial court clearly erred in making them
  • noting that \court-appointed custody investigators are officers of the court and perform quasi-judicial functions\
  • concluding discrepancies between oral and written decisions required remand
  • remanding a custody decision because one party drafted the findings, deviated from the court’s oral findings without indicating it had done so, and delayed submitting the proposed findings, which the court then signed almost immediately and without revision or explanation
  • “Normally, when inconsistencies arise between a court’s oral and written findings, the written decision prevails.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.