Skip to main content
· 6/13/2003

Harrower v. Harrower

Citations

  • 71 P.3d 854
  • 2003 Alas. LEXIS 48
  • 2003 WL 21373978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that shares of stock in husband's name had not been transmuted
  • holding that superior court's reliance on tax-assessed values was not clearly erroneous
  • holding that tax appraisals do not reliably measure true value}. 32 . See Haisley v. Grant, 486 P.2d 367, 370 (Alaska 1971). 33 . AS 25.24.160(a) provides in relevant part: In a judgment in an action for divorce ... (4
  • stating that increase in value of separate property is marital under active appreciation theory if resulting from marital efforts
  • stating that increase in value of separate property is marital under active appreciation theory if resulting from marital efforts
  • noting that transmutation converts the entire asset to marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.