Alaska Supreme Court· 12/9/2005
Hanson v. Hanson
Citations
- 125 P.3d 299
- 2005 Alas. LEXIS 166
- 2005 WL 3343823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding increase in value of husband's ongoing business which was attributable to his marital efforts was marital property
- holding court may consider minority discount, but does not have to apply discount in all instances
- explaining that minority share discounts may be “used in proper settings” but need not be “applied in all instances”
- holding husband’s active efforts increased value of business only he owned and worked for and that this appreciation was marital property
- applying active appreciation analysis and characterizing as marital property the increase in value of business attributable to husband’s marital labor
- applying active appreciation analysis and characterizing as marital property the increase in value of business attributable to husband's marital labor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-03-14· cited 85×
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 81×
- Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 54×
- Schickner v. SchicknerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-04-16· cited 50×
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2010-09-24· cited 41×
- Hooper v. HooperAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-07-25· cited 40×
- Stephens v. StephensNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-07-14· cited 33×
- Stanhope v. StanhopeAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-08-09· cited 31×
- Stevens v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-10-14· cited 28×
- Sarah D. v. John D.Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-06-12· cited 24×
- Sharon Thompson v. Everett ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-11-29· cited 22×
- Fink v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court· 2016-09-16· cited 21×
- Grove v. GroveAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-08-11· cited 21×
- Carr v. CarrAlaska Supreme Court· 2007-02-09· cited 18×
- Young v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-08-22· cited 18×
- Brennan v. BrennanAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-08-10· cited 17×
- Laura Aubert, Personal Representative of the Estate of David L. Aubert v. Debra J. Wilson, f/k/a Debra J. AubertAlaska Supreme Court· 2021-03-26· cited 15×
- Schaeffer-Mathis v. MathisAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-10-27· cited 14×
- Dragseth v. DragsethAlaska Supreme Court· 2009-07-10· cited 13×
- Veronica Louise Hudson v. Daniel Lee HudsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2023-07-07· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court· 1962-02-06· cited 197×
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 105×
- Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-01-15· cited 86×
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-04-16· cited 68×
- Lewis v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court· 1990-01-19· cited 62×
- Harrower v. HarrowerAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-06-13· cited 57×
- Marriage of Eyler v. EylerIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-05-22· cited 52×
- Carlson v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-07-18· cited 50×
- Money v. MoneyAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-05-21· cited 42×
- Hayes v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 31×
- Green v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-08-31· cited 29×
- Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-02-27· cited 28×
- Ogden v. OgdenAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-12-14· cited 27×
- Abood v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-09-02· cited 25×
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-17· cited 18×
- Inman v. InmanAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-04-11· cited 15×
- Compton v. ComptonAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-09-08· cited 15×
- Leis v. HustadAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-05-18· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.