Skip to main content

Hanson v. Hanson

Citations

  • 125 P.3d 299
  • 2005 Alas. LEXIS 166
  • 2005 WL 3343823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding increase in value of husband's ongoing business which was attributable to his marital efforts was marital property
  • holding court may consider minority discount, but does not have to apply discount in all instances
  • explaining that minority share discounts may be “used in proper settings” but need not be “applied in all instances”
  • holding husband’s active efforts increased value of business only he owned and worked for and that this appreciation was marital property
  • applying active appreciation analysis and characterizing as marital property the increase in value of business attributable to husband’s marital labor
  • applying active appreciation analysis and characterizing as marital property the increase in value of business attributable to husband's marital labor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.