Iverson v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for hearing on modification where parent alleged that other parent's new employment situation prevented him from caring for the child on a regular basis and child was often in custody of a family not approved by the court
• “[W]here a point is given only a cursory statement in the argument portion of a brief, the point will not be considered on appeal.” (quoting Adamson v. Univ. of Alaska, 819 P.2d 886, 889 n.3 (Alaska 1991))
• applying this standard of review to a child custody decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).