Alaska Supreme Court· 10/21/1994
Foster v. Foster
Citations
- 883 P.2d 397
- 1994 Alas. LEXIS 101
- 1994 WL 576206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- date marriage ceases to function as single economic unit, typically date of separation, is time after which newly-acquired property is non-marital
- \[T]he court can `recapture' the asset by giving it an earlier valuation date and crediting all or part of it to the account of the party who controlled the asset.\
- “The date that the marriage has ceased to function as a single economic unit, often the date of separation, is the date after which newly acquired property should be considered non-marital property.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Rabinowttz, Matthews, Compton, Bryner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 81×
- Harrower v. HarrowerAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-06-13· cited 57×
- Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 54×
- Jones v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 41×
- Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court· 2010-03-26· cited 36×
- Stevens v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-10-14· cited 28×
- Ogden v. OgdenAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-12-14· cited 27×
- Abood v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-09-02· cited 25×
- Brandal v. ShanginAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-02-27· cited 23×
- Laura Aubert, Personal Representative of the Estate of David L. Aubert v. Debra J. Wilson, f/k/a Debra J. AubertAlaska Supreme Court· 2021-03-26· cited 15×
- Brown v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-10-31· cited 13×
- Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 7×
- Foster v. State, Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-11-16· cited 7×
- Faris v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-07-12· cited 7×
- In Re the Marriage of LandauerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-03· cited 2×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-04-05· cited 86×
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-08-21· cited 77×
- Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-07-07· cited 73×
- Sheppard v. SheppardIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-12-16· cited 50×
- Jones v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 37×
- Pattee v. PatteeAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-10-30· cited 37×
- Gabaig v. GabaigAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-04-11· cited 33×
- Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court· 1984-01-27· cited 31×
- Oberhansly v. OberhanslyAlaska Supreme Court· 1990-09-14· cited 30×
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.D. Alaska· 1977-06-03· cited 28×
- Root v. RootAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-04-30· cited 18×
- In Re the Marriage of WellmanMontana Supreme Court· 1993-05-07· cited 15×
- Heffle v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-09-15· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.