Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that comments made in the context of a labor dispute were likely to be viewed by the audience as opinion
• finding that comments made in the context of a labor dispute were likely to be viewed by the audience as opinion
• explaining that a statement's use of the phrase \apparent\ demonstrates non-actionable opinion
• finding a letter \cautiously phrased in terms of apparency\ did not imply factual assertions
• finding a letter “cautiously phrased in terms of apparency” did not imply factual assertions
• sustaining demurrer because accusing plaintiff of \seeking personal gain and political prestige rather [than serving] the best interests of the members they were supposed to represent\ was \not properly the subject of a libel action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).