California Supreme Court· 7/23/1976
Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
Citations
- 552 P.2d 425
- 17 Cal. 3d 596
- 131 Cal. Rptr. 641
- 1976 Cal. LEXIS 310
- 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3638
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that comments made in the context of a labor dispute were likely to be viewed by the audience as opinion
- finding that comments made in the context of a labor dispute were likely to be viewed by the audience as opinion
- explaining that a statement's use of the phrase \apparent\ demonstrates non-actionable opinion
- finding a letter \cautiously phrased in terms of apparency\ did not imply factual assertions
- finding a letter “cautiously phrased in terms of apparency” did not imply factual assertions
- sustaining demurrer because accusing plaintiff of \seeking personal gain and political prestige rather [than serving] the best interests of the members they were supposed to represent\ was \not properly the subject of a libel action\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,770×
- Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-02-26· cited 431×
- Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakD.C. Circuit· 1984-12-06· cited 402×
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergNinth Circuit· 1986-11-06· cited 356×
- Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-09-02· cited 331×
- Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-17· cited 235×
- Scott v. News-HeraldOhio Supreme Court· 1986-08-06· cited 207×
- Jerome R. Lewis v. Time IncorporatedNinth Circuit· 1983-07-12· cited 195×
- NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-02-01· cited 170×
- Information Control Corporation v. Genesis One Computer Corporation, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1980-01-15· cited 147×
- Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-09-13· cited 146×
- Unelko Corp., an Illinois Corporation Howard G. Ohlhausen v. Andy Rooney, an Individual Cbs, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-24· cited 140×
- Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal· 2000-05-23· cited 131×
- Baker v. Los Angeles Herald ExaminerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 127×
- Kotlikoff v. the Community NewsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-04-27· cited 127×
- William Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1986-04-10· cited 121×
- Mamou v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-07-30· cited 108×
- Okun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 106×
- Good Government Group of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-11-27· cited 105×
- Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1995-01-25· cited 101×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 926×
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 794×
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 723×
- Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 227×
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-11-02· cited 106×
- In Re BlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-10-03· cited 97×
- Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-01-31· cited 61×
- DiGiorgio Furit Corp. v. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial OragnizationsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-04-30· cited 49×
- Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1974-02-14· cited 44×
- Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. AFL-CIOCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-04-30· cited 44×
- Sillars v. CollierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1890-02-25· cited 32×
- Howard v. Southern California Associated NewspapersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-01-16· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.