· 3/12/2003
Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port District
Citations
- 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 57
- 106 Cal. App. 4th 1219
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2827
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2244
- 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming fee award, and rejecting argument that billing was duplicative and unreasonable, because party opposing fee award failed to present evidence identifying, let alone demonstrating, allegedly redundant work
- elements of an intentional interference with contract claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Rourke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.