· 11/19/1984
Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 690 P.2d 610
- 37 Cal. 3d 244
- 208 Cal. Rptr. 137
- 11 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1065
- 1984 Cal. LEXIS 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[M]ere proof of ill will on the part of the publisher may ... be insufficient [to prove actual malice].”
- intentional infliction of emotional distress and “false light” invasion of privacy subject to actual malice standard
- “the defendant’s belief concerning the 8 truthfulness of the publication is the crucial issue”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broussard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.