Skip to main content
· 11/19/1984

Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 690 P.2d 610
  • 37 Cal. 3d 244
  • 208 Cal. Rptr. 137
  • 11 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1065
  • 1984 Cal. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[M]ere proof of ill will on the part of the publisher may ... be insufficient [to prove actual malice].”
  • intentional infliction of emotional distress and “false light” invasion of privacy subject to actual malice standard
  • “the defendant’s belief concerning the 8 truthfulness of the publication is the crucial issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broussard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.