Skip to main content
· 9/16/2013

John Doe v. Gangland Productions, Inc.

Citations

  • 730 F.3d 946
  • 41 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2481
  • 2013 WL 5066826
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, under California law, “[t]he elements of fraud are (1) misrepresentation; (2) knowledge of falsity; (3) intent to defraud; (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) resulting damage”
  • “Plaintiffs lawsuit arises directly from Defendants’ act of broadcasting Gangland.”
  • activity often simply referred to as “protected activ- ity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Harry, Jacqueline, Nguyen, Pregerson, William

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.