· 9/16/2013
John Doe v. Gangland Productions, Inc.
Citations
- 730 F.3d 946
- 41 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2481
- 2013 WL 5066826
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, under California law, “[t]he elements of fraud are (1) misrepresentation; (2) knowledge of falsity; (3) intent to defraud; (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) resulting damage”
- “Plaintiffs lawsuit arises directly from Defendants’ act of broadcasting Gangland.”
- activity often simply referred to as “protected activ- ity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Harry, Jacqueline, Nguyen, Pregerson, William
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.