Skip to main content
· 9/8/2005

Niang v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 422 F.3d 1187
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19382
  • 2005 WL 2160140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an applicant’s protected ground “must be central to the persecutor’s decision to act against” her
  • explaining that both asylum applicants and those seeking restriction on removal may establish a presumptive entitlement to relief based on past persecution
  • explaining that both asylum applicants and those seeking restriction on removal may establish a presumptive entitlement to relief based on past persecution
  • affirming denial of CAT relief where there was an adverse-credibility determination because if one factor in the § 1208.16(c)(3
  • discussing the definition of “social group” applied by the BIA in precedential decisions
  • addressing relevance of opportunity to relocate to eligibility for restriction on removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, McWilliams, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.