· 9/8/2005
Niang v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 422 F.3d 1187
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19382
- 2005 WL 2160140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an applicant’s protected ground “must be central to the persecutor’s decision to act against” her
- explaining that both asylum applicants and those seeking restriction on removal may establish a presumptive entitlement to relief based on past persecution
- explaining that both asylum applicants and those seeking restriction on removal may establish a presumptive entitlement to relief based on past persecution
- affirming denial of CAT relief where there was an adverse-credibility determination because if one factor in the § 1208.16(c)(3
- discussing the definition of “social group” applied by the BIA in precedential decisions
- addressing relevance of opportunity to relocate to eligibility for restriction on removal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, McWilliams, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.