Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-Aguirre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Chevron deference applies to the Board based on the statutory allocation of power laid out by Congress in the INA
• holding that decisions of the BIA interpreting the INA are entitled to Chevron deference
• holding that the Ninth Circuit erred by failing to defer to the BIA’s reasonable interpretation of the INA
• recognizing that “the BIA should be accorded Chevron deference as it gives ambiguous statutory terms ‘concrete meaning through a process of case-by-case adjudication’ ”
• holding that Chevron applies to many of the Board’s decisions interpreting stat- utes governing immigration issues
• recognizing that “the BIA should be accorded Chevron deference as it gives ambiguous statutory terms concrete meaning through a process of case-by-case adjudication” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).