Skip to main content
· 10/13/2005

Tulengkey v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 1277
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22069
  • 2005 WL 2563089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no past persecution where alien was robbed, fondled, and suffered a minor head injury
  • noting “denigration, harassment, and threats” are insufficient to establish persecution; finding no past persecution where alien was robbed, fondled, and suffered a minor head injury
  • finding no past persecution where alien was robbed, fondled, and suffered a minor head injury
  • collecting cases and holding that attack resulting in minor injury and separate incident involving harassment by Muslims did not amount to persecution
  • affirming finding of no past persecution based upon a robbery resulting in minor injury to the petitioner and her witnessing of a Muslim mob’s rough treatment of other people eight years later
  • affirming denial of asylum based on alien’s ability to relocate to avoid persecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Hartz, McCONNELL

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.