Second Circuit· 6/11/2008

Bah v. Mukasey

Citations

529 F.3d 99
2008 WL 2357411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that only future persecution “related to the original claim, e.g., persecution on account of membership in [the petitioner’s] particular social group,” is presumed
reviewing factual findings for substantial 2 1 evidence and reviewing de novo questions of law and the 2 application of law to facts
“We review de novo questions of law and the application of law to undisputed fact.”
“[W]e give ‘substantial deference’ to BIA decisions interpreting immigration regulations . . . , unless an interpretation is ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.’”
“[F]emale genital mutilation is not necessarily a one time event. . . . [R]ecord evidence reveals that genital mutilation, such as infibulation, is often repeated in Guinea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Straub, Pooler, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

468 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bah v. Mukasey

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.