Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 4/6/2006

Uanreroro v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 443 F.3d 1197
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8503
  • 2006 WL 895240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that resort to the IJ’s decision is appropriate when “the IJ’s analysis is all that can give substance to the B IA ’s reasoning in its order of affirmance.”
  • stating that a factual finding meets the substantial evidence standard where it is supported by “reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence”
  • explaining that “we will not affirm on grounds raised in the IJ decision unless they are relied upon by the BIA in its affirmance”
  • explaining that when the BIA’s decision provides “a condensed version” of the IJ’s reasons for the decision, we may consult the IJ’s “more complete discussion” to “give substance to the BIA’s reasoning”
  • explaining that when the BIA’s decision provides “a condensed version” of the IJ’s reasons for the decision, we may consult the IJ’s “more complete discussion” to “give substance to the BIA’s reasoning”
  • explaining that when the BIA’s decision provides “a condensed version” of the IJ’s reasons for its decision, we may consult the IJ’s “more complete discussion” to “give substance to the BIA’s reasoning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, McKAY, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.