Uanreroro v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that resort to the IJ’s decision is appropriate when “the IJ’s analysis is all that can give substance to the B IA ’s reasoning in its order of affirmance.”
• stating that a factual finding meets the substantial evidence standard where it is supported by “reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence”
• explaining that “we will not affirm on grounds raised in the IJ decision unless they are relied upon by the BIA in its affirmance”
• explaining that when the BIA’s decision provides “a condensed version” of the IJ’s reasons for the decision, we may consult the IJ’s “more complete discussion” to “give substance to the BIA’s reasoning”
• explaining that when the BIA’s decision provides “a condensed version” of the IJ’s reasons for the decision, we may consult the IJ’s “more complete discussion” to “give substance to the BIA’s reasoning”
• explaining that when the BIA’s decision provides “a condensed version” of the IJ’s reasons for its decision, we may consult the IJ’s “more complete discussion” to “give substance to the BIA’s reasoning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).