Witjaksono v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding assaults didn’t amount to persecution when they didn’t “requir[e] medical attention”
• applying de novo review over a ruling on due process because a legal issue was involved
• noting materiality and outcome-alteration as “foundational principles” guiding prejudice analysis in this context
• “Witjaksono’s descriptions of the 1998 Jakarta riots and the 1999 church bombing do not mandate relief.”
• “Without a showing of past persecution, an alien must demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he will be individually persecuted in the future.”
• “It is well settled that an alien in an immigration proceeding is entitled to a reasonably complete and accurate record to facilitate appellate review. . . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).