Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a court of appeals should remand a case to an agency for decision of a matter that statutes place primarily in agency hands”
• holding that when agency has not reached an issue, the proper course is to remand to the agency in the first instance to address it
• holding that appellate court erred by reaching question of changed country conditions where neither BIA nor IJ had been given a chance to address it in the first instance
• holding that appellate court erred by reaching question of changed country conditions where neither BIA nor IJ had been given a chance to address it in the first instance
• holding that when a matter has been entrusted to the agency to determine, remand is appropriate
• holding that absent rare circumstances, it is not appropriate for a court of appeals to grant asylum in the first instance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).