Nadarajah v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court had jurisdiction over a habeas corpus petition when the petition did not involve a final order of removal
• holding that the district court had jurisdiction over a habeas corpus petition when the petition did not involve a final order of removal
• holding that “the jurisdiction-stripping provision [of RIDA] does not apply to federal habeas corpus petitions that do not involve final orders of removal”
• holding that “the jurisdiction-stripping provision [of the REAL ID Act] does not apply to federal habeas corpus petitions that do not involve final orders of removal”
• holding that' 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(l)(B)(ii) “do[es] not authorize [the petitioner’s] indefinite detention”
• holding that § 1225(b)(1)(B)(ii) and (b)(2)(A) do not permit indefinite detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).