Casas-Castrillon v. Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Government’s authority to detain a noncitizen under Subsection C ends “upon the dismissal of the alien’s appeal by the BIA”
• holding that 2 “§ 1226(a) must be construed as requiring the Attorney General to provide the [noncitizen] 3 with such a hearing”
• holding that, once the BIA issues a 20 final removal order and the petitioner seeks judicial review of the removal, detention authority 21 shifts from § 1226(c) to § 1226(a)
• holding that a non-citizen petitioner held 12 in custody pursuant to removal proceedings may “bring collateral legal challenges to the 13 Attorney General’s detention authority . . . through a petition for habeas corpus”
• noting that the lack of a repatriation agreement or an administrative finding that the alien is entitled to relief from removal are relevant
• holding 23 that “§ 1226(a) must be construed as requiring the Attorney General to provide the 24 [noncitizen] with such a hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).