Jatinder Pal Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Charles H. Demore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the scope of habeas jurisdiction “is limited to claims that allege 18 constitutional or statutory error”
• involving only a challenge to the “particularly serious crime” determination and not challenging categorization of the crime as an aggravated felony
• involving only a challenge to the “particularly serious crime” determination and not challenging categorization of the crime as an aggravated felony
• \[O]ther courts have rejected the Government's argument that only 'purely legal questions of statutory interpretation' permit the exercise of habeas jurisdiction.... We agree with those rulings\
• “An aggravated felony that results in at least a five-year sentence is considered a particularly serious crime. Moreover, under Section 1231(b)(3)(B)(ii
• “An aggravated felony that results in at least a five-year sentence is considered a particularly serious crime. Moreover, under Section 1231(b)(3)(B)(ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).