Jose Patricio Boer-Sedano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “homosexual men in Mexico” constitute a particular social group for purposes of asylum
• holding that “homosexual men in Mexico” constitute a particular social group for purposes of asylum
• holding that where purpose of return trips was to gather income to flee permanently, trips did not rebut presumption of well- founded fear
• holding that “return trips can be considered as one factor, among others,” in determining whether a petitioner has “a well-founded fear of persecution”
• holding that return trips can be relevant factor indicating mitigated fear of future persecution for purposes of asylum
• holding that a police officer’s words during an assault “make clear that he was motivated by [a protected ground.”]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).