Supreme Court· 4/29/2003

Demore v. Kim

Citations

538 U.S. 510
123 S. Ct. 1708
155 L. Ed. 2d 724
2003 U.S. LEXIS 3428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that Immigration Judge applied Joseph “substantially unlikely” standard to alien challenging mandatory detention status
emphasizing that “the aliens in Carlson were not flight risks” and “had not been found individually dangerous”
considering statistics on flight risk posed by non-detained aliens when assessing challenge to immigration statute
upholding § 1226(c)’s mandatory-detention scheme against a challenge that alien detainees had a due-process right to individualized bond hearings
\It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings.\ (quoting Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 306 (1993))
Souter, Stevens and Ginsburg, JJ. concurring in part, “As a consequence, due process requires dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rehnquist, Kennedy, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

415 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Demore v. Kim

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.