Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice” implicating “constitutional concerns”
• holding that the government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice”
• recognizing that 6 months of immigration detention is prolonged no matter the 14 authorizing statute of detention
• holding that the government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice” implicating 26 “constitutional concerns”
• holding that “the constitutionally grounded hearing requirements set forth in Singh are 14 also applicable [to bond hearings for those detained under § 1225(b)]”
• holding that the 5 government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice” 6 implicating “constitutional concerns”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).