Ninth Circuit· 4/16/2013

Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins

Citations

715 F.3d 1127
2013 WL 1607706
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice” implicating “constitutional concerns”
holding that the government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice”
recognizing that 6 months of immigration detention is prolonged no matter the 14 authorizing statute of detention
holding that the government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice” implicating 26 “constitutional concerns”
holding that “the constitutionally grounded hearing requirements set forth in Singh are 14 also applicable [to bond hearings for those detained under § 1225(b)]”
holding that the 5 government “cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice” 6 implicating “constitutional concerns”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wardlaw, Gould, Haddon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.