Skip to main content
· 4/27/2007

David Nnadika v. Attorney General of the United States

Citations

  • 484 F.3d 626
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9582
  • 2007 WL 1227474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the District Court retains jurisdiction\ where a non-citizen \does not challenge the administrative removal order\
  • holding that “the District Court retains jurisdiction” where a non-citizen “does not challenge the administrative removal order”
  • holding that an alien’s challenge to his or her detention must be pursued in a petition for habeas corpus filed in the District Court, not in a petition for review of an order of removal filed with the court of appeals
  • district court retains jurisdiction where non-citizen is not challenging the administrative removal order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Ambro, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.