Vijendra K. Singh v Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal court may not second-guess the “executive’s exercise of discretion” when it comes to the detention or release of noncitizens
• holding that § 1226(e) “does not limit habeas jurisdiction over As Ramos argues, “[w]hile 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e
• holding that § 1226(e) “does not limit habeas jurisdiction over constitutional claims or questions of law”
• holding that § 1226(e) “does not limit habeas jurisdiction over constitutional claims or questions of law”
• holding that § 1226(e) “does not limit habeas jurisdiction over constitutional claims or questions of law”
• holding that § 1226(e) “does not limit habeas jurisdiction over. constitutional claims or questions of law’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).