Skip to main content

Melton v. State

Citations

  • 949 So. 2d 994
  • 2006 WL 3455072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel is not deficient in failing to call witnesses who refuse to cooperate with the defense and are therefore unavailable for trial; Occhicone v. State, 768 So. 2d 1037, 1048 (Fla. 2000
  • “Claims alleging that a defendant’s jury was not a fair cross-section of the community should be raised on direct appeal.”
  • “If a witness would not have been available to testify at trial, then the defendant will not be able to establish deficient performance or prejudice from counsel’s failure to call, interview, or investigate that witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.