Supreme Court of Florida· 11/18/2010

Kilgore v. State

Citations

55 So. 3d 487
35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 665
2010 Fla. LEXIS 1976
2010 WL 4643043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant’s postconviction challenge to Florida’s method of execution was procedurally barred because it was not raised on direct appeal
reiterating that the capital defendant has no right under Atkins to a jury determination whether he is mentally retarded
holding a challenge to the constitutionality of rule 4–3.5(d)(4) procedurally barred in postconviction proceedings and noting moreover that “this Court has repeatedly rejected claims that Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4–3.5(d)(4) is unconstitutional”
holding a challenge to the constitutionality of rule 4–3.5(d)(4) procedurally barred in postconviction proceedings and noting moreover that “this Court has repeatedly rejected claims that Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4–3.5(d)(4) is unconstitutional”
“Kilgore has failed to demonstrate that the proffered evidence [of failure to ensure an adequate mental health evaluation was performed for trial] had a reasonable probability of changing the outcome, which is a probability sufficient to undermine our confidence in the verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Polston, Labarga, Perry, Pariente, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.