Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 879 A.2d 1111
  • 388 Md. 446
  • 2005 Md. LEXIS 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of the statute, the statute is ambiguous.”
  • “Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and, therefore, we review de novo the decision of the Circuit Court.”
  • “Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and, therefore, we review de novo the decision of the Circuit Court.”
  • “[t]he First Amendment permits a state to proscribe the distribution of sexual materials involving minors without regard to an obscenity standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.