Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/11/2005
Moore v. State
Citations
- 879 A.2d 1111
- 388 Md. 446
- 2005 Md. LEXIS 476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of the statute, the statute is ambiguous.”
- “Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and, therefore, we review de novo the decision of the Circuit Court.”
- “Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and, therefore, we review de novo the decision of the Circuit Court.”
- “[t]he First Amendment permits a state to proscribe the distribution of sexual materials involving minors without regard to an obscenity standard.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-18· cited 113×
- Walzer v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-17· cited 101×
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-19· cited 90×
- Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 82×
- Stoddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-05· cited 73×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-28· cited 63×
- Reier v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-05· cited 61×
- Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-16· cited 57×
- Nicolas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-08· cited 56×
- Kane v. Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-12· cited 47×
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-13· cited 43×
- Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-21· cited 42×
- Gilmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-07· cited 34×
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-04· cited 34×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-05· cited 34×
- Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-15· cited 29×
- Himes Associates, Ltd. v. AndersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-29· cited 26×
- La Valle v. La ValleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-26· cited 25×
- University of Maryland Medical System Corp. v. WaldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-10· cited 24×
- Kilmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-03· cited 22×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-07· cited 106×
- Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-23· cited 97×
- Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-13· cited 96×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-16· cited 72×
- Gwin v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-10· cited 62×
- Outmezguine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-03· cited 49×
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-13· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. HindsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-05-24· cited 42×
- Perry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-12-18· cited 22×
- State v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 21×
- Rutledge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-04-30· cited 18×
- State v. SislerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-07-24· cited 18×
- Piper Rudnick LLP v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-08· cited 16×
- Outmezguine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-23· cited 11×
- People v. FraserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-16· cited 9×
- Kelly v. William Morrow & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1986-11-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.