Skip to main content
· 10/16/2006

Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of Baltimore

Citations

  • 909 A.2d 235
  • 395 Md. 16
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • quoting Kushell v. Dep’t of Natural Res., 385 Md. 563, 576, 870 A.2d 186, 193 (2005)
  • “proceedings or acts that scrutinize individual parcels or assemblages for the consideration of property-specific proposed uses, at the owner’s or developer’s initiative, ordinarily suggest a quasi-judicial process or act”
  • “proceedings or acts that scrutinize individual parcels or assemblages for the consideration of property-specific proposed uses, at the owner’s or developer’s initiative, ordinarily suggest a quasi-judicial process or act”
  • A decision by the Baltimore City Council to amend the design and density of a mixed-use PUD was quasi-judicial, as opposed to legislative, in nature.
  • The purpose of Article III § 29 “is to inform the members of the General Assembly and the public of the nature of the proposed legislation.”
  • also commenting that the terms “quasi-judicial” and “administrative adjudication” are synonymous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.