Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/13/1994

Gargliano v. State

Citations

  • 639 A.2d 675
  • 334 Md. 428
  • 1994 Md. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting “repeat offender” statute as enhancing sentence only when conviction for one crime precedes conduct of second crime
  • interpreting \repeat offender\ statute as enhancing sentence only when conviction for one crime precedes conduct of second crime
  • characterizing these penalties as the “two-time loser,” “three-time loser,” and “four-time loser” provisions
  • “Interpretation of the language of this statute in full context further requires that [Maryland Code (1957, 1992 RepLVol.) Article 27,] § 286(c
  • “If the language of the statute is plain and clear and expresses a meaning consistent with the statute’s apparent purpose, no further analysis is ordinarily required.”
  • “If the language of the statute is plain and clear and expresses a meaning consistent with the statute’s apparent purpose, no further analysis is ordinarily required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gargliano v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.