Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/28/2005
Lawson v. State
Citations
- 886 A.2d 876
- 389 Md. 570
- 2005 Md. LEXIS 663
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When a jury is asked to place themselves in the shoes of the victim, the attorney improperly appeals to their prejudices and asks them to abandon their neutral fact finding role.”
- prosecutor may make arguments warranted by evidence or reasonable inferences therefrom
- prosecutor may make arguments warranted by evidence or reasonable inferences therefrom
- “ ‘[Rjeversal is only required where it appears that the remarks of the prosecutor actually misled the jury or were likely to have misled or influenced the jury to the prejudice of the accused.’ ” (quoting Spain v. State, 386 Md. 145, 158, 872 A.2d 25 (2005))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cathell, Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. CosTenth Circuit· 2007-08-21· cited 81×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-13· cited 53×
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-22· cited 52×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-04-16· cited 47×
- Fuentes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-07-12· cited 45×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-08· cited 39×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-05· cited 34×
- Donaldson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-26· cited 30×
- Myer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-10· cited 28×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-26· cited 26×
- State v. StringfellowCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-23· cited 25×
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-04· cited 22×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-29· cited 21×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-12-12· cited 21×
- James v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-24· cited 19×
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-16· cited 17×
- Leidig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-08-16· cited 15×
- Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-21· cited 15×
- Jones-Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-13· cited 12×
- Coates v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-30· cited 12×
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-05-15· cited 588×
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-02-15· cited 337×
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 310×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-26· cited 257×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-17· cited 171×
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 162×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- McKenna v. NevadaSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 153×
- Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-17· cited 149×
- I. W. Berman Properties v. Porter Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-08· cited 148×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-25· cited 131×
- State v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-07· cited 113×
- People v. McNealIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 113×
- Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-07· cited 103×
- Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.