Skip to main content

Lawson v. State

Citations

  • 886 A.2d 876
  • 389 Md. 570
  • 2005 Md. LEXIS 663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When a jury is asked to place themselves in the shoes of the victim, the attorney improperly appeals to their prejudices and asks them to abandon their neutral fact finding role.”
  • prosecutor may make arguments warranted by evidence or reasonable inferences therefrom
  • prosecutor may make arguments warranted by evidence or reasonable inferences therefrom
  • “ ‘[Rjeversal is only required where it appears that the remarks of the prosecutor actually misled the jury or were likely to have misled or influenced the jury to the prejudice of the accused.’ ” (quoting Spain v. State, 386 Md. 145, 158, 872 A.2d 25 (2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell, Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.