Skip to main content

Rutledge v. State

Citations

  • 745 So. 2d 912
  • 1999 WL 254498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that ‘‘it is impossible for the [l]egislature to consider every societal and tech- nological change that may occur and the effect those changes may have [on] the particular conduct it is seek- ing to regulate’’
  • construing child-pornography statute prohibiting possession of a “photographic or other visual reproduction” to include images stored on computers, computer discs, and the Internet

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baschab

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.