Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 12/18/2002
Perry v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 438 Mass. 282
- 780 N.E.2d 53
- 2002 Mass. LEXIS 877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that any distinction based on how the pornographic images are stored or communicated is immaterial given the harm the statute was enacted to address
- stating that Ashcroft was not at issue because materials depicted actual children
- stating that Ashcroft was not at issue because materials depicted actual children
- stating that Ashcroft was not at issue because materials depicted actual children
- stating that Ashcroft was not at issue because materials depicted actual children
- stating that Ashcroft was not at issue because materials depicted actual children
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cowin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-11· cited 77×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-29· cited 29×
- Sellers's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-12-19· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-11-09· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. LeneskiMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-05-15· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. DingleMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-12-04· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-09-01· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. EricsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-05-23· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. BundyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-06-13· cited 6×
- Massachusetts Community College Council v. Massachusetts Board of Higher EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-07-12· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. BiagiottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-06-11· cited 3×
- Clermont v. Fallon Clinic, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2003-05-15· cited 1×
- Getz v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-19
- Joseph Webb v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-05-29
- John Anthony Mohl v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-05-29
- Morra v. StrangeMassachusetts Superior Court· 2007-09-26
- Milne v. HutchenreiderMassachusetts Superior Court· 2008-08-11
- Commonwealth v. RomeroMassachusetts Superior Court· 2010-02-11
- Commonwealth v. SnowMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2024-07-08
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court· 2002-04-16· cited 1,129×
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court· 1918-01-07· cited 577×
- Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-29· cited 275×
- Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-11-14· cited 147×
- Commonwealth v. OakesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-20· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. HindsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-05-24· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. HughesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1973-12-19· cited 37×
- Chandler v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-08-07· cited 28×
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Beacon Hill Architectural CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-01-04· cited 25×
- People v. FraserNew York Court of Appeals· 2001-02-20· cited 14×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-04-12· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-02-12· cited 10×
- People v. FraserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-16· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. WashburnMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-07-23· cited 6×
- Auditor of the Commonwealth v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-07-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.