Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/7/2005

Gilmer v. State

Citations

887 A.2d 549
389 Md. 656
2005 Md. LEXIS 729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court erred when it did not credit the defendant for time served and the charges were nol prossed
explicating the temporal significance of the attachment of jeopardy to the consequences of the entry of a nol pros for a defendant
“When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of a statute, however, the statute is ambiguous.”
“When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of a statute, however, the statute is ambiguous.”
“When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of a statute, however, the statute is ambiguous.”
“Obviously the type of nolle prosequi which does not bar future prosecution under another charging document has the same effect as a dismissal without prejudice.” (quoting State v. Morgan, 33 Md. 44, 46 (1870))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia, Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.