Comptroller of the Treasury v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the plain language ... is unambiguous and is consistent with the [enactment’s] apparent purpose, we give effect to the [enactment] as it is written”
• “If the plain language ... is unambiguous and is consistent with the [enactment’s] apparent purpose, we give effect to the [enactment] as it is written”
• “If the plain language ... is unambiguous and is consistent with the [enactment’s] appar ent purpose, we give effect to the [enactment] as it is written”
• “If the plain language of the statute is unambiguous and is consistent with the statute’s apparent purpose, we give effect to the statute as it is written.”
• “§ 13– 510(a)(1) of the Tax–General Article authorizes a person aggrieved by a tax assessment to appeal to the Tax Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).