Tenth Circuit· 3/28/2003
Minshall v. McGraw Hill Broadcasting Co.
Citations
- 323 F.3d 1273
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6002
- 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1095
- 2003 WL 1605832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to find manager’s age-related comments pretextual because manager didn’t “participate in the decision not to renew [plaintiff’s] contract”
- finding a nexus between news director’s statements reflecting a desire to utilize on-air reporters under forty years old and the decision not to renew the plaintiff’s contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Baldock, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2010-08-05· cited 657×
- Leibowitz v. Cornell UniversitySecond Circuit· 2009-10-23· cited 415×
- Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2015-06-02· cited 108×
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneTenth Circuit· 2006-06-20· cited 108×
- Racher v. Westlake Nursing Home Ltd. PartnershipTenth Circuit· 2017-09-28· cited 105×
- Keylon v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2008-08-05· cited 89×
- Miller v. EBY Realty Group LLCTenth Circuit· 2005-01-25· cited 88×
- Hardeman v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 2004-08-05· cited 81×
- Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Tenth Circuit· 2005-12-20· cited 69×
- In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationD. Kansas· 2003-12-01· cited 48×
- Ryan Development Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2013-03-27· cited 33×
- Barrella v. Village of FreeportE.D. New York· 2014-08-28· cited 31×
- Sprint Communications Company L.P., v. Vonage Holdings Corp.D. Kansas· 2007-08-07· cited 28×
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneTenth Circuit· 2005-10-25· cited 27×
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationD. Kansas· 2006-08-16· cited 23×
- Busch v. Hancock (In Re Busch)Tenth Circuit· 2007-06-04· cited 22×
- Estate of Sisk v. ManzanaresD. Kansas· 2003-06-23· cited 21×
- In Re Urethane Antitrust LitigationD. Kansas· 2009-08-14· cited 19×
- Stroup v. United AirlinesTenth Circuit· 2022-02-28· cited 19×
- PS Ex Rel. Nelson v. the Farm, Inc.D. Kansas· 2009-09-08· cited 17×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court· 1993-04-20· cited 1,653×
- United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraTenth Circuit· 1990-04-04· cited 491×
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1994-01-20· cited 448×
- Phelps v. HamiltonTenth Circuit· 1997-08-12· cited 414×
- Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1990-01-18· cited 239×
- Alvin Rea, Gordon Keepers, Robert Reynolds, Barbara Weightman, and Barbara Van Den Arend v. Martin Marietta CorporationTenth Circuit· 1994-06-20· cited 214×
- Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-05· cited 199×
- Weese v. SchukmanTenth Circuit· 1996-10-15· cited 170×
- Coleman v. B-G Maintenance Management of Colorado, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1997-03-10· cited 162×
- United States v. Lorenzo Jesus Mejia-AlarconTenth Circuit· 1993-06-07· cited 140×
- Fallis v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 126×
- Curtis v. Oklahoma City Public Schools Board of EducationTenth Circuit· 1998-06-16· cited 119×
- Tyler v. RE/MAX Mountain States, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2000-11-21· cited 114×
- Guillermo Sanjuan, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ibp, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1998-11-16· cited 102×
- The Sill Corporation v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1965-04-27· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.