Sprint Communications Company L.P., v. Vonage Holdings Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that legal conclusions are not \facts as would be admissible in evidence\ as Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 requires (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘[A]synchronous’ is a term of art in the communications field that refers to communications where the transmitting and receiving devices do not communicate based on a synchronized clock . . . [P]ackets are generally communicated without a timing relationship (or synchronized clock

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).