In Re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to expand Tennessee’s class action tolling jurisprudence to include cross-jurisdictional tolling in antitrust cases
• noting no efficiency in tolling state statutes of limitation because plaintiffs would need to file individual suits to assert their state law claims regardless of whether the statutes of limitation were tolled
• declining to apply American Pipe tolling when sitting in diversity because of the established - 22 - principle that \state law alone must govern the application of a tolling principle to a state's statute of limitations\
• “in the absence of Indiana authority recognizing the [cross-jurisdictional tolling] doctrine, the Court declines to import a new tolling rule into that state’s limitations law”
• “The evidence pertaining to price fixing points to the concealment of those activities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2010-12-30· cited 60×
• In re Epipen
  D. Kansas· 2018-08-20· cited 25×
• Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-31· cited 14×
• Centaur Classic Convertible Arbitrage Fund Ltd. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.
  C.D. California· 2011-01-20· cited 13×
• Soward v. Deutsche Bank Ag
  S.D. New York· 2011-09-01· cited 12×
• Adedje v. Westat, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-06· cited 9×
• In Re Urethane Antitrust Litigation
  D. Kansas· 2010-01-25· cited 8×
• Wilkins v. Genzyme Corporation
  First Circuit· 2024-02-15· cited 5×
• In Re Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-06-13· cited 3×
• Carpenter Co. v. BASF SE
  D. Kansas· 2010-01-25· cited 3×
• In re Refrigerant Compressors Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2015-03-13

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human Services
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 3,738×
• American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
• Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
• Bryson v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 909×
• Kowalski v. Tesmer
  Supreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 675×
• Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-02-14· cited 395×
• Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-24· cited 382×
• Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 357×
• Chardon v. Fumero Soto
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 275×
• Cayman Exploration Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-04-26· cited 192×
• Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2007-08-16· cited 149×
• Minshall v. McGraw Hill Broadcasting Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 2003-03-28· cited 118×
• In Re Copper Antitrust Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-02-06· cited 117×
• King & King Enterprises, D/B/A King Gas & Oil and Carl R. King, D/B/A King Gas & Oil v. Champlin Petroleum Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1981-09-14· cited 93×
• Native American Distributing v. Seneca-Cayuga Tobacco Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-11-17· cited 82×
• Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-03-06· cited 70×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Boellstorff
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-09-12· cited 59×