D. Kansas· 8/16/2006
In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 237 F.R.D. 440
- 2006 WL 2391128
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that common issues will predominate the fraudulent concealment analysis because “the key inquiry will focus on the defendants’ conduct — that is, what the defendants did — rather than on the plaintiffs’ conduct”
- explaining why a class action “is by far the best method for resolving the claims at issue in this lawsuit”
- collecting case law on this issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lungstrum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Seegott Holdings, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2014-09-29· cited 60×
- Jacob v. Duane Reade, Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-08-08· cited 42×
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.D. Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 27×
- In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-12-07· cited 24×
- Nieberding v. Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc.D. Kansas· 2014-09-08· cited 22×
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationD. Kansas· 2008-07-28· cited 20×
- In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust LitigationD. Connecticut· 2009-02-13· cited 20×
- In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationD. Kansas· 2012-01-19· cited 19×
- Sibley v. Sprint Nextel Corp.D. Kansas· 2008-11-24· cited 17×
- Eatinger v. BP America Production Co.D. Kansas· 2010-08-02· cited 14×
- In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2010-03-28· cited 12×
- Bennett v. Sprint Nextel Corp.D. Kansas· 2014-03-27· cited 12×
- In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationD. Kansas· 2010-05-28· cited 9×
- Warnick v. Dish Network LLCD. Colorado· 2014-06-27· cited 9×
- In re: Urethane AntiTrust LitiTenth Circuit· 2014-09-29
- In re: Urethane AntiTrust Liti v.Tenth Circuit· 2014-09-29
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court· 1946-02-25· cited 1,492×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2001-10-17· cited 451×
- Rutter & Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Tenth Circuit· 2002-12-24· cited 254×
- Adamson v. BowenTenth Circuit· 1988-08-15· cited 238×
- J.B. Ex Rel. Hart v. ValdezTenth Circuit· 1999-08-12· cited 220×
- Blades v. Monsanto Co.Eighth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 203×
- Shook v. El Paso CountyTenth Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 202×
- Green v. New Mexico Dept.Tenth Circuit· 2005-08-30· cited 186×
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationTenth Circuit· 1995-09-06· cited 184×
- Trevizo v. AdamsTenth Circuit· 2006-07-26· cited 165×
- Coleman v. B-G Maintenance Management of Colorado, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1997-03-10· cited 162×
- Deiter v. Microsoft Corp.Fourth Circuit· 2006-02-07· cited 155×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. AT&T Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 143×
- Rector v. City & County of DenverTenth Circuit· 2003-11-06· cited 143×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 138×
- Anderson v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 1982-10-12· cited 126×
- Minshall v. McGraw Hill Broadcasting Co.Tenth Circuit· 2003-03-28· cited 118×
- Weinman v. Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (In Re Integra Realty Resources, Inc.)Tenth Circuit· 2004-01-14· cited 92×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.