Tenth Circuit· 8/12/1997

Phelps v. Hamilton

Citations

122 F.3d 1309
1997 WL 458202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, where the motion “involves ‘reconsideration of matters properly encompassed in a decision on the merits,’” a court considers the motion under rule 59(e)
concluding that courts should consider motions that seek to alter the court’s substantive ruling under rule 59
holding that plaintiffs against whom charges were dropped following an acquittal did not have standing to challenge state law as facially unconstitutional \based solely on past prosecutions\
holding that Kansas state trial court’s finding of no bad faith, on a motion to dismiss criminal charges for prosecutor’s bad faith, was decisive in a § 1983 claim as to the issue of bad faith
stating that because the “actionable conduct” of defendants has been a “moving target,” plaintiff had not “thus far” introduced “the entire relevant panoply of facts needed to overcome the shortcomings identified by the Court”
finding privity through control because non-party/attorney had input into the legal theories and arguments advanced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Henry, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Phelps v. Hamilton

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.