Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that -29- testimony of other employees about their treatment by the defendant is relevant to the issue of discriminatory intent
• holding that testimony by other employees about the defendant’s mistreatment of them based on age was relevant to the issue of discriminatory intent in a Title VII age discrimination case
• stating that front pay is awarded when reinstatement is not appropriate; both are remedies for wrongful discharge
• affirming jury’s constructive-discharge finding where employer gave employee choice between either quitting and taking early retirement benefits or being terminated and losing retirement benefits
• no error to award front pay after finding employer's hostility and employer's implied accusations of plaintiff's dishonesty to other employees rendered productive and amicable working relationship impossible
• testimony of other employees about their treatment by defendant relevant to issue of employer’s discriminatory intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).