Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/15/2004

Hall v. State

Citations

160 S.W.3d 24
2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1477
2004 WL 948342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the “trial judge, who presided over the trial and the habeas proceedings, was in the best position to evaluate the conflicting evidence”
recognizing that the issue of mental retardation to avoid the death penalty may be presented in a habeas proceeding as well as at trial
requiring that all three prongs of the definition be satisfied for a successful claim of mental retardation
requiring that all three prongs of the definition be satisfied for a successful claim of mental retardation
explaining that where there was conflicting evidence regarding mental retardation, the “trial judge, who presided over the trial and the habeas proceedings, was in the best position to evaluate the conflicting evidence”
explaining that where there was conflicting evidence regarding mental retardation, the A trial judge, who presided over the trial and the habeas proceedings, was in the best position to evaluate the conflicting evidence @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Johnson, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.