Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 604 So. 2d 799
  • 1992 WL 163965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that habeas is improper to relitigate issues that either were or could have been raised on direct appeal
  • holding that section 776.041 jury instruction was proper on claim of self defense to felony murder charge where underlying felonies were burglary and aggravated battery
  • concluding that the trial court’s error in instructing the jury was harmless where it “inure[d] to the benefit of the defendant”
  • identifying under sentence of imprisonment, prior violent felony, and during the commission of a felony as strong aggravating factors
  • dissents by Justices McDonald and Overton

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.