Skip to main content

Jennings v. State

Citations

  • 512 So. 2d 169
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “prior sworn statement of state witness” “could not be introduced for purposes of impeachment because [the witness] admitted that he had made the prior inconsistent statements”
  • holding that no error occurred when the alternate juror was allowed to momentarily retire to the jury room because the record showed that “the alternate juror did not participate in the jury deliberations”
  • observing that a juror's concealment on voir dire of information which may have been material to whether the juror would have been excused on peremptory challenge or for cause, and which is not revealed or discovered until after trial, can justify the granting of a new trial
  • observing that a juror's concealment on voir dire of information which may have been material to whether the juror would have been excused on peremptory challenge or for cause, and which is not revealed or discovered until after trial, can justify the granting of a new trial
  • “The trial judge has broad discretion in deciding whether a juror may sit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.