Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 854 So. 2d 1235
  • 2003 WL 21354775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an Ake claim contained within an ineffective assistance of counsel claim \procedurally barred because it could have been raised on direct appeal\
  • stating that issues raised without argument in an appellate brief are “insufficiently presented for review.”
  • noting that Marshall's trial counsel did not want to call Dr. Klass to testify \because `he would have been blown out of the water' when the jury learned that he only spent a short time with Marshall\
  • \[T]he claim of incompetent mental health evaluation is procedurally barred for failure to raise it on direct appeal.\
  • “A juror is not competent to testify about matters inhering in the verdict, such as jurors’ emotions, mental processes, or mistaken beliefs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.