Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 981 So. 2d 449
  • 2008 WL 450327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is error for trial court to read forcible-felony instruction to jury where defendant is not charged with independent forcible felony
  • finding that the error in the forcible felony instruction was not fundamental for two reasons: self- defense was not the defendant’s only strategy, and his self-defense claim was extremely weak
  • finding that despite trial court’s erroneous instruction on self-defense exception, the error did not deprive defendant of a fair trial because “the likelihood that the jury would have found [p]etitioner not guilty based on self-defense was minimal at best.”
  • finding no fundamental error in self-defense jury instruction because self-defense was not the only strategy pursued by the defendant and his claim of self-defense was “extremely weak”
  • finding the forcible felony instruction improperly given when the defendant was charged with both attempted murder and aggravated battery and claimed self-defense as to both charges
  • finding the forcible-felony instruction on self-defense was not warranted, but the reading of the instruction was not fundamental error as it did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.