S.D. Florida· 5/20/2014
Mamani v. Berzaín
Citations
- 21 F. Supp. 3d 1353
- 2014 WL 2069491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ATS claims against defendants residing in the United States were barred because all conduct relevant to claims “occurred on foreign soil”
- collecting cases and noting that a few courts “have sustained ATS claims ... where at least some — if not a substantial portion — of the relevant conduct occurred domestically”
- dismissing ATS claims because all relevant action took place in Bolivia
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-12· cited 114×
- Eloy Royas Mamani v. Jose Carlos Sanchez BerzainEleventh Circuit· 2016-06-16· cited 54×
- Jovic v. L-3 Services, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2014-09-24· cited 11×
- Estate of Alvarez v. Johns Hopkins UniversityD. Maryland· 2017-08-30· cited 6×
- Doe I v. Cisco Systems, Inc.N.D. California· 2014-09-05· cited 4×
- Mamani v. BerzaínS.D. Florida· 2018-02-14· cited 2×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 8,220×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 1,211×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 770×
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 550×
- Griffin Industries, Inc. v. IrvinEleventh Circuit· 2007-08-21· cited 459×
- Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 452×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 2013-04-17· cited 438×
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-12-17· cited 402×
- Mohamad v. Palestinian AuthoritySupreme Court· 2012-04-18· cited 390×
- Eloy Rojas Mamani v. Jose Carlos Sanchez BerzainEleventh Circuit· 2011-08-29· cited 302×
- Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2009-06-30· cited 291×
- Financial SEC. Assur., Inc. v. Stephens, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2007-09-18· cited 285×
- Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 215×
- Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 214×
- In Re YamashitaSupreme Court· 1946-02-04· cited 196×
- Arkan Ali v. Donald RumsfeldD.C. Circuit· 2011-06-21· cited 172×
Other cases named Mamani v. Berzaín
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.