Supreme Court· 1/14/2014

Daimler AG v. Bauman

Citations

134 S. Ct. 746
187 L. Ed. 2d 624
2014 U.S. LEXIS 644
82 U.S.L.W. 4043
571 U.S. 117
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 503
2014 WL 113486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a corporation is \a distinct legal entity” that \can act only through its agents” (internal quotation omitted)
holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction “whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate”
holding that the place of incorporation and principal place of business are the primary loci where the exercise of general jurisdiction is proper
holding that a corporation is subject to general personal jurisdiction in its \place of incorporation and principal place of business\
holding that the defendant's several physical locations in California did not subject it to general jurisdiction in California
holding that the defendant’s several physical locations in California did not subject it to general jurisdiction in California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,044 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.