N.D. Illinois· 9/24/2014
Jovic v. L-3 Services, Inc.
Citations
- 69 F. Supp. 3d 750
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133939
- 2014 WL 4748614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the Croatian military leaders who participated in Operation Storm, which the U.S. defendants allegedly helped plan and execute, were convicted of war crimes, but their convictions were later overturned
- observing that the Croatian military leaders who participated in Operation Storm, which the U.S. defendants allegedly helped plan and execute, were convicted of war crimes, but their convictions were later overturned
- declining to dismiss state-law conspiracy claim brought against private military contractor by Serbian survivors of military operations Croatia
- dismissing ATS claims against U.S. corporations because presumption against extraterritoriality was not rebutted
- dismissing ATS claims against U.S. corporations because presumption against extraterritoriality was not rebutted
- where a plaintiffs allegations did not “conclusively demonstrate that the doctrines of equitable tolling or equitable estoppel would not apply” dismissal of plaintiffs claims at the pleadings stage is not appropriate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-12· cited 114×
- County of Cook v. HSBC North America Holdings Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2015-09-30· cited 17×
- Cnty. of Cook v. HSBC N. Am. Holdings Inc.E.D. Illinois· 2018-05-30· cited 12×
- Ruiz v. WilliamsN.D. Illinois· 2015-11-17· cited 8×
- Armada (Singapore) Pte Ltd. v. Amcol International Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2017-03-21· cited 8×
- Bader v. Air Line Pilots Ass'nN.D. Illinois· 2015-07-09· cited 6×
- Porter v. CombsN.D. Illinois· 2015-05-15· cited 2×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court· 1980-05-27· cited 2,697×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 1,894×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 1,766×
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichSeventh Circuit· 2008-05-27· cited 1,583×
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 1,211×
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 1,133×
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 984×
- Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Seventh Circuit· 2009-07-16· cited 570×
- Independent Trust Corp. v. Stewart Information Services Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2012-01-06· cited 523×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 2013-04-17· cited 438×
- United States v. Dewayne Lewis, Dewayne Lewis v. Susan Bolden, Branch Manager of the Midwest America Federal Credit UnionSeventh Circuit· 2005-06-15· cited 347×
- Reynolds v. CB Sports Bar, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2010-10-22· cited 330×
- Anita Christensen and Robert Alty v. County of Boone, Illinois, and Edward KriegerSeventh Circuit· 2007-04-16· cited 316×
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-10-07· cited 316×
- Xechem, Inc., and Xechem International, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanySeventh Circuit· 2004-06-23· cited 226×
- Serra v. LappinNinth Circuit· 2010-04-09· cited 223×
- Andonissamy v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Seventh Circuit· 2008-11-07· cited 190×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.